Category: Uncategorized

  • Vietnam Briefing: Vietnam Abstains From Condemning Russia’s Invasion Of Ukraine

    Vietnam Briefing: Vietnam Abstains From Condemning Russia’s Invasion Of Ukraine

    The Vietnam Briefing, which is released every Monday morning Vietnam time, looks at Vietnam’s social and political developments of the past week.

    Source:  The Vietnamese Magazine


    Vietnam abstained from United Nations’ resolution condemning Russian aggression

    • On March 2, as the UN General Assembly approved a nonbinding resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Vietnam remained one of 35 countries that abstained. It is also one of the only two countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN,) together with Laos, that chose not to publicly vote in favor of the resolution.
    • In the resolution, the UN stated that it deplored “the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine.” It also demanded that Russia “immediately cease its use of force against Ukraine” and “immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces.”
    • Vietnamese Ambassador at the UN Dang Hoang Giang on March 1 made a speech during its special session on the situation in Ukraine, calling on involved parties to “stop the use of force, resume dialogue, and seek longterm solutions to differences.”
    • He also mentioned the need to “ensure security and safety of the people and protect essential infrastructure in accordance with international humanitarian law” and asked the international community to “continue providing humanitarian aid for civilians.”
    • Nataliya Zhynkina, chargé d’affaires a.i. at the Embassy of Ukraine in Vietnam, wrote in a Facebook status that she was “deeply disappointed” about its abstention.
    • As Russia’s closest partner and ally, the Vietnamese government has been largely silent on voicing its support for Ukraine while refraining from criticizing Russia for its unprovoked attacks on a sovereign state. Meanwhile, local pro-government internet users have also been seen widely supporting the Kremlin’s manufactured reasons for its invasion.

    Vietnamese scholars, lawyers, and activists show support for Ukrainian people

    Radio Free Asia:

    • Two groups of Vietnamese scholars, attorneys, and representatives from civil society organizations voiced support for Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invading army. It strikes a markedly different tone than their government’s stance, which has largely been silent on the war.
    • In a letter to Nataliya Zhynkina, three dozen Vietnamese declared themselves “freedom lovers” and urged Ukrainians to resist Russia in defense of their “young democracy,” which emerged from an authoritarian past.
    • Among the signatories were members of the Civil Society Forum, Nguyen Trong Vinh Club, Le Hieu Dang Club, Lap Quyen Dan, and Vietnam Independent Writers Initiative. They noted that while Vietnam is a communist country, many Vietnamese believe that independence and democracy — values that Ukrainians are protecting — are important.
    • The letter and a second one a group of attorneys wrote to Russian President Vladimir Putin circulated among closed groups on Facebook. They stand in sharp contrast to the Vietnamese government’s overarching passivity to the conflict.
    • The two letters also criticized Vietnamese who support Putin’s actions in Ukraine. “Given invasion threats from China, as Vietnamese people, they should have empathized with Ukrainian people instead of supporting Putin’s invasion,” Mac Van Trang, an expert on sociopolitical issues in Vietnam, said about the pro-Russia stance of several Vietnamese groups. “How stupid and narrowminded they are!”
    • Meanwhile, on March 4, a group of local activists and civil society organizations gave donations worth more than 200 million dong (US$8,755) to the Ukrainian Embassy in Vietnam via its chargé d’affaires Nataliya Zhynkina. The donations were locally raised and “surpassed 200 million after one day,” one of the organizers wrote. “We understand and […] share the losses that the Ukrainian people and its government have been bearing,” he added.

    Vietnamese activist arrested on allegations of “distributing anti-state materials”

    • Vietnam’s state media on March 1 reported that Ho Chi Minh City Police had arrested Tran Van Bang, a local dissident, and pro-democracy activist, for investigations of his alleged activities of “storing, making, and posting online materials that propagandize, distort, and defame the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.” It added that his posts had “intended to defy the government and negatively affect social security and order.”
    • Bang was subsequently prosecuted under Article 117 of Vietnam’s 2015 Penal Code, which penalizes anyone who “distributes anti-state materials.”According to the police, the investigation agency had conducted a search of his house and “collected a number of books and materials containing anti-state information.”
    • Following Bang’s arrest, his attorney – Dang Dinh Manh – told RFA that he was in the process of registering to defend his client. Attorney Manh added that he would be allowed visitation to his client only after the police finished its investigation.
    • Bang, 61, is a member of the Le Hieu Dang Club, a local organization advocating for democracy and the protection of Vietnam’s sovereignty, and also a regular attendee at several anti-China protests in Vietnam. In 2015, he was assaulted by security forces at an anti-China rally in Ho Chi Minh City.

    Vietnamese court postponed the trial of former journalist

    • On March 3, the Hanoi People’s Court announced that the trial of former independent journalist Le Van Dung was postponed after one of the judges tested positive for COVID-19, according to attorney Ha Huy Son.
    • Previously, Dung had his trial scheduled on March 11 on accusations of “distributing anti-state propaganda.” The new trial date will be announced later, Son added.
    • Commonly known by his pen name Le Dung Vova, Dung was detained in late June last year after the police issued a national warrant for his arrest. He owned a Vietnamese language personal media channel – Chan Hung Nuoc Viet TV – where he reported and live-streamed his comments on different social and environmental issues.

    China announces South China Sea drills close to Vietnam coast

    Reuters:

    “In a statement late on Friday, the Hainan Maritime Safety Administration said the drills would start from the same day and last until March 15.

    It provided coordinates for an area roughly halfway between Hainan’s Sanya and the Vietnamese city of Hue. Sanya is home to a major Chinese naval base.”


    Salinization in Mekong Delta in Vietnam to a spike in March

    Radio Free Asia:

    “On Feb. 7, Vietnam’s Southern Institute of Water Resources Research (SIWRR) said that the Mekong Delta had been suffering from early salinity intrusion since the beginning of the dry season as China had been limiting water discharge from its upstream hydropower plants.

    According to SIWRR, China’s decision to cut water discharge from its storage reservoirs to generate electricity has been one of the key causes of the salinity levels.”


    Vietnam Insight: Learn more about Vietnam

    Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: The Diplomatic Dilemma Facing Vietnam

    The Diplomat/ Hai Hong Nguyen/ March 4

    “Prima facie, these statements reveal that Vietnam faces a dilemma in how to respond to the war in Ukraine. Reading between the lines, however, Vietnam is sending different messages not only on Russia and Ukraine but also with regard to other potential future conflicts.”

    ASEAN needs to uphold principles, not neutrality, in Ukraine war

    Nikkei Asia/ Huong Le Thu/ March 2

    “Still, ASEAN’s muted response to Russia’s attack on Ukraine is disappointing. Even more so was the joint statement by ASEAN foreign ministers calling for restraint from “all parties.”

    Trying to remain impartial when one country is bombing the unarmed civilians of another country does nothing to uphold the principle of neutrality. It is, in fact, a blurring of black and white.”

    ASEAN response to Ukraine crisis a show of ‘diplomatic cowardice’

    RFA/ Zachary Abuza/ March 2

    “Already riddled with divisions over Chinese aggression in the South China Sea, the damming of the Mekong, the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya, and the 2021 coup d’êtat in Myanmar, ASEAN, through its toothless response to the Russian invasion, yet again is proving inept in collectively addressing a security issue with potential implications for Southeast Asia.”

    What’s in a Name: The Promise and Peril of a US-Vietnam ‘Strategic Partnership’

    The Diplomat/ Phuong Vu/ March 2

    “It should not be controversial to point out that Vietnam and the U.S. share a deeper, more multi-faceted relationship than some nations higher up in Hanoi’s diplomatic hierarchy. Since 2013, the U.S.-Vietnam comprehensive partnership has made significant strides. In 2020, bilateral trade reached $92.2 billion, more than nine times higher than Vietnam’s trade with India. The U.S. is Vietnam’s 11th largest investor, with nearly $10 billion invested in the country.”


    💡
  • Pham Doan Trang in Radio Free Asia: Vietnam’s crackdown target: citizens who can inspire others

    The Vietnamese Communist Party has been arresting dissidents, including independent journalists, religious figures, land rights activists and environmentalists- generally, anyone who can mobilize and influence their fellow citizens.  


    Excerpt:

    The political activist Pham Doan Trang, who was arrested in October 2020, was a particular headache for the Vietnamese government as she was not philosophically inclined in her writing. Instead, she communicated Vietnamese laws, constitutional rights, and procedures in ways that ordinary people could understand. She exposed how the government violated its own laws, garnering her a large following. She’s now serving a nine-year sentence for spreading “propaganda against the state.”

    That Mother Mushroom and Pham Doan Trang had won multiple foreign awards and had deep international networks of support only amplified their voices at home. International recognition raised concerns of foreign interference amongst the conservative party elite.


    Download:

  • News: Pham Doan Trang Film World Premiere set on March 3, 2022

    News: Pham Doan Trang Film World Premiere set on March 3, 2022

    The International Film and Human Rights Festival (FIFDH) dedicates its 20th edition to 2 women activists – 2022 Martin Ennals Laureate Pham Doan Trang and Ida Leblanc, a winner of the Martine Anstett 2022 Prize.

    Join us in the world premiere of the film on Pham Doan Trang this Thursday, March 3 at 12:30h CET (Geneva time)!

    💡
    Watch and register here.
  • Pham Doan Trang in One Free Press Coalition’s 10 Most Urgent, March 2022

    Pham Doan Trang in One Free Press Coalition’s 10 Most Urgent, March 2022

    Embattled journalist and human rights defender Pham Doan Trang is listed as one of the most urgent cases of women journalists facing harassment, injustice and press freedom issues.


    Excerpt:

    Ahead of International Women’s Day observed on March 8, the One Free Press Coalition in partnership with the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and the International Women’s Media Foundation (IWMF) are highlighting 10 cases of women journalists who have faced retaliation or threats because of their reporting.

    While some of the threats faced by these journalists are widespread press freedom issues, women journalists face unique challenges. In particular, women  journalists face a greater amount of harassment online, as well as workplace harassment, with IWMF estimating that a third of female journalists have considered changing jobs because of threats. A 2020 UNESCO report found that globally 73% of women journalists had faced online harassment, which in some cases turned into physical threats and had serious impacts on mental health.

    6. Pham Doan Trang (Vietnam)

    In December, Vietnamese authorities sentenced journalist Trang to nine years in prison. Trang covers human rights topics, including police abuses and environmental issues. Trang has faced harassment in the past for her reporting. Days before her arrest in October 2020, Trang released a letter titled, “Just in case I am imprisoned.”


    Download:

  • Vietnam Briefing: Vietnam “Concerned” About The Situation in Ukraine, Plans To Evacuate Its Citizens

    Vietnam Briefing: Vietnam “Concerned” About The Situation in Ukraine, Plans To Evacuate Its Citizens

    The Vietnam Briefing, which is released every Monday morning Vietnam time, looks at Vietnam’s social and political developments of the past week.

    Source: The Vietnamese Magazine


    Vietnamese courts approve appeal requests for local activists

    • On February 14, the Hanoi Supreme People’s Court sent a notice to attorney Dang Dinh Manh that on January 27 it had approved his application as a defense lawyer for the appeal trial of journalist Pham Doan Trang.
    • The court’s decision was followed by Doan Trang’s request for an appeal after her conviction of “distributing anti-state propaganda” and received nine years of imprisonment. The appeal hearing is expected to take place within 90 days of the approval day.
    • Also, the family of activist Do Nam Trung announced last week that the Hanoi Court on the same day had approved attorney Dang Dinh Manh as a defense lawyer for his appeal hearing. Trung was given a 10-year prison sentence for “distributing anti-state propaganda” last year, which was considered relatively harsh given his less well-known activism.
    • Meanwhile, attorney Manh also told RFA Vietnamese in an interview that he would defend Le Huu Minh Tuan, a member of the Independent Journalists Association of Vietnam (IJAVN), in his appeal hearing scheduled on February 28. Tuan was sentenced to an 11-year prison sentence in January 2021, along with two other members of IJAVN, on allegations of “distributing anti-state propaganda.
    • At the same time, Tran Quoc Khanh, who self-nominated himself as a candidate for Vietnam’s National Assembly elections last year, had his previous conviction upheld at an appeal trial on February 17. Khanh was sentenced to six and a half years of imprisonment last October under allegations of “distributing anti-state propaganda.”

    Vietnamese court to try another independent journalist on “anti-state” charges

    • The Hanoi People’s Court is scheduled to hold a trial on March 11 for the independent journalist Le Van Dung, commonly known by his pen name Le Dung Vova, on accusations of “distributing anti-state propaganda,” according to his defense lawyer Ha Huy Son.
    • Dung, 52, was detained in late June last year after the police issued a national warrant for his arrest. He was on the run when the investigation authorities announced their decision to prosecute and arrest him in May 2021.
    • Le Van Dung owned a Vietnamese language personal media channel, Chan Hung Nuoc Viet TV, where he reported and live-streamed his comments on different social and environmental issues. According to Dung’s family, the evidence used to prosecute him mostly consists of his online live streamings.
    • Attorney Son also told RFA Vietnamese during an interview that his client’s health and mentality remained stable.

    Local citizens assaulted over land rights disputes

    • Last week, a video showing a group of people wearing uniforms beating up several female protesters was widely circulated on Vietnamese social media. The conflict was later confirmed to have occurred at a construction site on February 18 in Hoang Hoa District, Thanh Hoa Province.
    • According to RFA’s investigation, the citizens who were assaulted during the conflict are members of a local family who had disputes over land ownership with an investment company called Flamingo. The company is carrying out a luxury resort project at the locality. Meanwhile, the attackers were said to be Flamingo’s security guards.
    • Tran Huy Hiep, who recorded the video, and who also has a land ownership dispute with Flamingo, said that his land was forcefully confiscated by the investment company without any compensation. When asked about whether or not his family had informed the provincial authorities of the conflict, Hiep said his family had contacted the district authorities, but that they claimed that “the land was owned by the local district government” and therefore it has the right to “sell that [land] to the company.”

    The Archdiocese of Hanoi calls for respect for religious freedom in a letter to authorities

    Agenzia Fides:

    • On February 24, the Catholic Church in Hanoi sent a letter of urgent complaint to various Vietnamese provincial and national authorities and called on the People’s Committee of Hoa Binh Province to respect the religious freedom and pastoral activities of the Catholic faithful in the province.
    • The letter was published four days after two people entered the Vu Ban Church in Hoa Binh Province, taking the microphone from the pulpit and ordering those attending mass to disperse for “pandemic control” reasons. The people are the secretary of the Communist Party of the city of Vu Ban City, Pham Hong Duc, and vice-president of its People’s Committee, Pham Van Chien.
    • In the published letter, the Archdiocese of Hanoi said: “This is a disrespectful act, an abuse of power that seriously violates the right to religious freedom, the right to the religious practice of bishops, priests and laypeople.”
    • The statement also said that this gesture “is unacceptable in a country where the rule of law prevails” and it “has aroused indignation and the pain of those who attended the mass as well as all those who saw the images on the web and social media.”

    The Vietnamese government, “concerned” about the situation in Ukraine, plans to evacuate citizens

    • In a statement on February 25, the spokeswoman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Le Thi Thu Hang said Vietnam “is concerned about the armed conflict in Ukraine” and that it called on involved sides “to exercise restraint, abide by the United Nations Charter and basic principles of international law,” among other things.
    • The country, however, did not condemn Russia’s military operations against Ukraine while only describing the invasion as “armed conflict” on state media.
    • At the same time, Vietnam Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh has ordered the Ministry of Transport to prepare plans to evacuate Vietnamese citizens and their families in Ukraine, VnExpress reports. According to government numbers, there are about 7,000 Vietnamese people living in Ukraine, mainly in Kharkiv, Odessa, and Kyiv.

    U.S. envoy for climate vows to help Vietnam meet key COP26 commitment

    VnExpress:

    • The U.S. special presidential envoy for climate, John Kerry, has expressed his appreciation for Vietnam’s COP26 commitments and reaffirmed the U.S. pledge to assist the country with this effort.
    • Kerry, who paid a four-day visit to Vietnam starting February 22, said the U.S. stood ready to assist Vietnam in reviewing, adjusting its strategy, and planning towards the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, a key commitment announced by Vietnam’s leaders at COP26 in the United Kingdom last November.
    • He also added the United States would continue to work closely with Vietnam on specific and timely measures, especially in developing renewable energy and reducing emissions, formulating policies to phase out coal power, and developing sustainable infrastructure.

    Forbes Vietnam removes a man from its Under 30 list following harassment allegations

    VnExpress:

    • Ngo Hoang Anh, 22, has been removed from the Forbes Vietnam Under 30 list, the magazine announced Thursday. The Forbes list published on February 14 honors Anh in the field of science and education, but it drew a backlash after several high school classmates said they had been verbally harassed by him.
    • “Regarding the case of Ngo Hoang Anh, after carefully considering all aspects of the issue, including the inspirational spirit of the list and Ngo Hoang Anh’s wishes in an email sent to the magazine, Forbes Vietnam decided to withdraw him from Year 2022 Under 30 list.”
    • The Forbes Vietnam 30 Under 30 listing has been honoring Vietnamese youth in several areas including businesses and startups, science and education, social activities, art, entertainment, and sports.

    Vietnam Hit by Fuel Shortages as Hundreds of Retailers Run Dry

    Bloomberg:

    “Vietnam is suffering from fuel shortages with hundreds of retailers forced to halt sales, prompting Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh to order an investigation of the market, including imports and exports of gasoline.

    Nearly 300 petrol and oil retailers across the country have stopped product sales, according to the trade ministry, which carried out a round of inspections. Reasons ranged from insufficient supplies from wholesalers and distributors to workers contracting Covid-19, it said. Local media have published photos of shuttered petrol stations displaying signs that they had run out of gasoline.”


    Vietnam Insight: Learn more about Vietnam

    On Ukraine crisis, Vietnam media stray from typical pro-Russia coverage

    RFA/ RFA Staff/ February 24

    “When the so-called Euromaidan protest movement rocked Ukraine in 2014, followed by the Russia-Ukraine conflict that led to the annexation of Crimea by Russia, Vietnamese state-run media generally blamed the crisis on “the West.” Fault was seen to lie with the U.S. and on NATO expansion aimed at bringing Ukraine out of Russia’s sphere of influence.

    Today, the picture is different.”

    Looking beyond the tip of Vietnam’s corruption iceberg

    East Asia Forum/ Hai Hong Nguyen/ February 23

    “With public attention increasing, the Viet A case will serve as a ‘test kit’ for Trong and the CPV’s anti-corruption efforts. Vietnamese netizens are embroiled in the question of the true perpetrators behind this multi-million-dollar case. Some suspect the case is wholesale ‘state manipulation’ beyond just a few bad actors. Regardless, Phan Dinh Trac, an assistant to Trong in the CSCC and Head of the Central Commission for Internal Affairs (CCIA), recently affirmed that the CCIA would pursue the Viet A and other grand corruption cases to the end despite mounting pressure.”

    President Phuc Wants To Solidify Vietnam’s Strategic Ties With Singapore

    Eurasia Review/ Veeramalla Anjaiah/ February 25

    “With a population of about 100 million people and a dynamic market profile (low-cost labor, rapid-growing economy, and strategic location among other strengths), Vietnam is an appealing target for Singapore partners to establish businesses.

    Vietnam needs a strong supporter like Singapore in its conflict with China. The aggressive behavior of China in the SCS and growing tensions between China and the US are threatening the peace and security in the region.”


    💡
  • LIV supports Electronic Frontier Foundation: Letter to the United Nations to Include Human Rights Safeguards in Proposed Cybercrime Treaty

    Legal Initiatives for VIETNAM, together with more than 130 civil society organizations, individual experts and academics, joins Electronic Frontier Foundation in a letter to the United Nations seeking robust civil society participation throughout all stages of the development and drafting of the Cybercrime Treaty that could potentially change policing in a global scale and infringe on human rights.  


    Letter:

    December 22, 2021

    H.E. Ms Faouzia Boumaiza Mebarki

    Chairperson

    Ad Hoc Committee to Elaborate a Comprehensive International Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Criminal Purposes

    Your Excellency,

    We, the undersigned organizations and academics, work to protect and advance human rights, online and offline. Efforts to address cybercrime are of concern to us, both because cybercrime poses a threat to human rights and livelihoods, and because cybercrime laws, policies, and initiatives are currently being used to undermine people’s rights. We therefore ask that the process through which the Ad Hoc Committee does its work includes robust civil society participation throughout all stages of the development and drafting of a convention, and that any proposed convention include human rights safeguards applicable to both its substantive and procedural provisions.

    Background

    The proposal to elaborate a comprehensive “international convention on countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes” is being put forward at the same time that UN human rights mechanisms are raising alarms about the abuse of cybercrime laws around the world. In his 2019 report, the UN special rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, Clément Nyaletsossi Voule, observed, “A surge in legislation and policies aimed at combating cybercrime has also opened the door to punishing and surveilling activists and protesters in many countries around the world.” In 2019 and once again this year, the UN General Assembly expressed grave concerns that cybercrime legislation is being misused to target human rights defenders or hinder their work and endanger their safety in a manner contrary to international law. This follows years of reporting from non-governmental organizations on the human rights abuses stemming from overbroad cybercrime laws.

    When the convention was first proposed, over 40 leading digital rights and human rights organizations and experts, including many signatories of this letter, urged delegations to vote against the resolution, warning that the proposed convention poses a threat to human rights.

    In advance of the first session of the Ad Hoc Committee, we reiterate these concerns. If a UN convention on cybercrime is to proceed, the goal should be to combat the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes without endangering the fundamental rights of those it seeks to protect, so people can freely enjoy and exercise their rights, online and offline. Any proposed convention should incorporate clear and robust human rights safeguards. A convention without such safeguards or that dilutes States’ human rights obligations would place individuals at risk and make our digital presence even more insecure, each threatening fundamental human rights.

    As the Ad Hoc Committee commences its work drafting the convention in the coming months, it is vitally important to apply a human rights-based approach to ensure that the proposed text is not used as a tool to stifle freedom of expression, infringe on privacy and data protection, or endanger individuals and communities at risk.

    The important work of combating cybercrime should be consistent with States’ human rights obligations set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and other international human rights instruments and standards. In other words, efforts to combat cybercrime should also protect, not undermine, human rights. We remind States that the same rights that individuals have offline should also be protected online.

    Scope of Substantive Criminal Provisions

    There is no consensus on how to tackle cybercrime at the global level or a common understanding or definition of what constitutes cybercrime. From a human rights perspective, it is essential to keep the scope of any convention on cybercrime narrow. Just because a crime might involve technology does not mean it needs to be included in the proposed convention. For example, expansive cybercrime laws often simply add penalties due to the use of a computer or device in the commission of an existing offense. The laws are especially problematic when they include content-related crimes. Vaguely worded cybercrime laws purporting to combat misinformation and online support for or glorification of terrorism and extremism, can be misused to imprison bloggers or block entire platforms in a given country. As such, they fail to comply with international freedom of expression standards. Such laws put journalists, activists, researchers, LGBTQ communities, and dissenters in danger, and can have a chilling effect on society more broadly.

    Even laws that focus more narrowly on cyber-enabled crimes are used to undermine rights. Laws criminalizing unauthorized access to computer networks or systems have been used to target digital security researchers, whistleblowers, activists,  and journalists. Too often, security researchers, who help keep everyone safe, are caught up in vague cybercrime laws and face criminal charges for identifying flaws in security systems. Some States have also interpreted unauthorized access laws so broadly as to effectively criminalize any and all whistleblowing; under these interpretations, any disclosure of information in violation of a corporate or government policy could be treated as “cybercrime.” Any potential convention should explicitly include a malicious intent standard, should not transform corporate or government computer use policies into criminal liability, should provide a clearly articulated and expansive public interest defense, and include clear provisions that allow security researchers to do their work without fear of prosecution.

    Human Rights and Procedural Safeguards

    Our private and personal information, once locked in a desk drawer, now resides on our digital devices and in the cloud. Police around the world are using an increasingly intrusive set of investigative tools to access digital evidence. Frequently, their investigations cross borders without proper safeguards and bypass the protections in mutual legal assistance treaties. In many contexts, no judicial oversight is involved, and the role of independent data protection regulators is undermined. National laws, including cybercrime legislation, are often inadequate to protect against disproportionate or unnecessary surveillance.

    Any potential convention should detail robust procedural and human rights safeguards that govern criminal investigations pursued under such a convention. It should ensure that any interference with the right to privacy complies with the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality, including by requiring independent judicial authorization of surveillance measures. It should also not forbid States from adopting additional safeguards that limit law enforcement uses of personal data, as such a prohibition would undermine privacy and data protection. Any potential convention should also reaffirm the need for States to adopt and enforce “strong, robust and comprehensive privacy legislation, including on data privacy, that complies with international human rights law in terms of safeguards, oversight and remedies to effectively protect the right to privacy.”

    There is a real risk that, in an attempt to entice all States to sign a proposed UN cybercrime convention, bad human rights practices will be accommodated, resulting in a race to the bottom. Therefore, it is essential that any potential convention explicitly reinforces procedural safeguards to protect human rights and resists shortcuts around mutual assistance agreements.

    Meaningful Participation

    Going forward, we ask the Ad Hoc Committee to actively include civil society organizations in consultations—including those dealing with digital security and groups assisting vulnerable communities and individuals—which did not happen when this process began in 2019 or in the time since.

    Accordingly, we request that the Committee:

    • Accredit interested technological and academic experts and nongovernmental groups, including those with relevant expertise in human rights but that do not have consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the UN, in a timely and transparent manner, and allow participating groups to register multiple representatives to accommodate the remote participation across different time zones.
    • Ensure that modalities for participation recognize the diversity of non-governmental stakeholders, giving each stakeholder group adequate speaking time, since civil society, the private sector, and academia can have divergent views and interests.
    • Ensure effective participation by accredited participants, including the opportunity to receive timely access to documents, provide interpretation services, speak at the Committee’s sessions (in-person and remotely), and submit written opinions and recommendations.
    • Maintain an up-to-date, dedicated webpage with relevant information, such as practical information (details on accreditation, time/location, and remote participation), organizational documents (i.e., agendas, discussions documents, etc.), statements and other interventions by States and other stakeholders, background documents, working documents and draft outputs, and meeting reports.

    Countering cybercrime should not come at the expense of the fundamental rights and dignity of those whose lives this proposed Convention will touch. States should ensure that any proposed cybercrime convention is in line with their human rights obligations, and they should oppose any proposed convention that is inconsistent with those obligations.

    We would be highly appreciative if you could kindly circulate the present letter to the Ad Hoc Committee Members and publish it on the website of the Ad Hoc Committee.

    Signatories,*

    1. Access Now – International
    2. Alternative ASEAN Network on Burma (ALTSEAN) – Burma
    3. Alternatives – Canada
    4. Alternative Informatics Association – Turkey
    5. AqualtuneLab – Brazil
    6. ArmSec Foundation – Armenia
    7. ARTICLE 19 – International
    8. Asociación por los Derechos Civiles (ADC) – Argentina
    9. Asociación Trinidad / Radio Viva – Trinidad
    10. Asociatia Pentru Tehnologie si Internet (ApTI) – Romania
    11. Association for Progressive Communications (APC) – International
    12. Associação Mundial de Rádios Comunitárias (Amarc Brasil) – Brazil
    13. ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR)  – Southeast Asia
    14. Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication (BNNRC) – Bangladesh
    15. BlueLink Information Network  – Bulgaria
    16. Brazilian Institute of Public Law – Brazil
    17. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)  – Cambodia
    18. Cambodian Institute for Democracy  –  Cambodia
    19. Cambodia Journalists Alliance Association  –  Cambodia
    20. Casa de Cultura Digital de Porto Alegre – Brazil
    21. Centre for Democracy and Rule of Law – Ukraine
    22. Centre for Free Expression – Canada
    23. Centre for Multilateral Affairs – Uganda
    24. Center for Democracy & Technology – United States
    25. Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) – International
    26. Centro de Estudios en Libertad de Expresión y Acceso (CELE) – Argentina
    27. Civil Society Europe
    28. Coalition Direitos na Rede – Brazil
    29. Código Sur – Costa Rica
    30. Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) – Africa
    31. CyberHUB-AM – Armenia
    32. Data Privacy Brazil Research Association – Brazil
    33. Dataskydd – Sweden
    34. Derechos Digitales – Latin America
    35. Defending Rights & Dissent – United States
    36. Digital Citizens – Romania
    37. DigitalReach – Southeast Asia
    38. Digital Rights Watch – Australia
    39. Digital Security Lab – Ukraine
    40. Državljan D / Citizen D – Slovenia
    41. Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) – International
    42. Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) – United States
    43. Elektronisk Forpost Norge – Norway
    44. Epicenter.works for digital rights – Austria
    45. European Center For Not-For-Profit Law (ECNL) Stichting – Europe
    46. European Civic Forum – Europe
    47. European Digital Rights (EDRi) – Europe
    48. ​​eQuality Project – Canada
    49. Fantsuam Foundation – Nigeria
    50. Free Speech Coalition  – United States
    51. Foundation for Media Alternatives (FMA) – Philippines
    52. Fundación Acceso – Central America
    53. Fundación Ciudadanía y Desarrollo de Ecuador
    54. Fundación CONSTRUIR – Bolivia
    55. Fundacion Datos Protegidos  – Chile
    56. Fundación EsLaRed de Venezuela
    57. Fundación Karisma – Colombia
    58. Fundación OpenlabEC – Ecuador
    59. Fundamedios – Ecuador
    60. Garoa Hacker Clube  –  Brazil
    61. Global Partners Digital – United Kingdom
    62. GreenNet – United Kingdom
    63. GreatFire – China
    64. Hiperderecho – Peru
    65. Homo Digitalis – Greece
    66. Human Rights in China – China
    67. Human Rights Defenders Network – Sierra Leone
    68. Human Rights Watch – International
    69. Igarapé Institute — Brazil
    70. IFEX – International
    71. Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy (ELSAM) – Indonesia
    72. The Influencer Platform – Ukraine
    73. INSM Network for Digital Rights – Iraq
    74. Internews Ukraine
    75. InternetNZ – New Zealand
    76. Instituto Beta: Internet & Democracia (IBIDEM) – Brazil
    77. Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor (IDEC) – Brazil
    78. Instituto Educadigital – Brazil
    79. Instituto Nupef – Brazil
    80. Instituto de Pesquisa em Direito e Tecnologia do Recife (IP.rec) – Brazil
    81. Instituto de Referência em Internet e Sociedade (IRIS) – Brazil
    82. Instituto Panameño de Derecho y Nuevas Tecnologías (IPANDETEC) – Panama
    83. Instituto para la Sociedad de la Información y la Cuarta Revolución Industrial – Peru
    84. International Commission of Jurists – International
    85. The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
    86. IT-Pol – Denmark
    87. JCA-NET – Japan
    88. KICTANet – Kenya
    89. Korean Progressive Network Jinbonet – South Korea
    90. Laboratorio de Datos y Sociedad (Datysoc) – Uruguay
    91. Laboratório de Políticas Públicas e Internet (LAPIN) – Brazil
    92. Latin American Network of Surveillance, Technology and Society Studies (LAVITS)
    93. Lawyers Hub Africa
    94. Legal Initiatives for Vietnam
    95. Ligue des droits de l’Homme (LDH) – France
    96. Masaar – Technology and Law Community – Egypt
    97. Manushya Foundation – Thailand
    98. MINBYUN Lawyers for a Democratic Society – Korea
    99. Open Culture Foundation – Taiwan
    100. Open Media  – Canada
    101. Open Net Association – Korea
    102. OpenNet Africa – Uganda
    103. Panoptykon Foundation – Poland
    104. Paradigm Initiative – Nigeria
    105. Privacy International – International
    106. Radio Viva – Paraguay
    107. Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales (R3D) – Mexico
    108. Regional Center for Rights and Liberties  – Egypt
    109. Research ICT Africa
    110. Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) – Canada
    111. Share Foundation – Serbia
    112. Social Media Exchange (SMEX) – Lebanon, Arab Region
    113. SocialTIC – Mexico
    114. Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network (SAFEnet) – Southeast Asia
    115. Supporters for the Health and Rights of Workers in the Semiconductor Industry (SHARPS) – South Korea
    116. Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (STOP)  – United States
    117. Tecnología, Investigación y Comunidad (TEDIC) – Paraguay
    118. Thai Netizen Network  – Thailand
    119. Unwanted Witness – Uganda
    120. Vrijschrift – Netherlands
    121. West African Human Rights Defenders Network – Togo
    122. World Movement for Democracy – International
    123. 7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media  – Arab Region

    `Individual Experts and Academics

    1. Jacqueline Abreu, University of São Paulo
    2. Chan-Mo Chung, Professor, Inha University School of Law
    3. Danilo Doneda, Brazilian Institute of Public Law
    4. David Kaye, Clinical Professor of Law, UC Irvine School of Law, former UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression (2014-2020)
    5. Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Professor Emeritus, University of Aarhus; Member, Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace
    6. Douwe Korff, Emeritus Professor of International Law, London Metropolitan University
    7. Fabiano Menke, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
    8. Kyung-Sin Park, Professor, Korea University School of Law
    9. Christopher Parsons, Senior Research Associate, Citizen Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto
    10. Marietje Schaake, Stanford Cyber Policy Center
    11. Valerie Steeves, J.D., Ph.D., Full Professor, Department of Criminology University of Ottawa

    *List of signatories as of February 25, 2022


    Download:

  • Pham Doan Trang in VOA Tiếng Việt: Việt Nam phản đối Anh, Canada trao giải cho nhà báo bất đồng chính kiến

    Vietnam opposes Britain, Canada awarding dissident journalist

    Deputy Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hanoi, Pham Thu Hang said that Vietnam objected to the Media Freedom Award given to acclaimed journalist Pham Doan Trang by the British and Canadian Foreign Ministries, stating that the prominent human rights activist has “violated Vietnamese law.”  Furthermore, the Spokesperson also said that the Ms. Trang’s recognition is “not conducive to the development of bilateral relations with Vietnam.”


    Excerpt:

    Note:  Original texts in Vietnamese.

    The British and Canadian governments announced the awarding of the 2022 Media Freedom Award to Trang, Vietnam’s most famous dissident journalist, at the Press Freedom Conference in Tallinn, Estonia, on February 10. This is the latest award for Trang, who is internationally recognized for her work fighting for democracy in a Vietnam where there is little freedom of the press and is often criticized for its poor human rights record.

    Responding to this, Deputy Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hanoi, Pham Thu Hang, said that the British and Canadian Foreign Ministry’s handing the award to Ms. Trang, whom the Vietnamese government considers “a violative individual” who has been “breaking the law”, is a “partial” and “inappropriate” action.

    Responding to a reporter’s request for comment on the awarding, Hang said on February 18 that the 44-year-old dissident journalist had been “arrested and tried for several times in serious violation of the law.”

    Ms. Trang was arrested in October 2020 and sentenced to nine years in prison for “Propaganda against the state” last December. Western governments, including the US, and international human rights organizations have voiced their objections to the Vietnamese government’s conviction.

    According to the deputy spokeswoman of BNG Vietnam, Ms. Trang has “contacted organizations and individuals abroad, published illegal publications with content to propagate, guide, and incite activities to overthrow the people’s government.” Ms. Hang said this behavior was “dangerous to society.”

    In addition to co-founding Luat Khoa Magazine, an independent journalistic form in Vietnam, Trang is also the author of many books banned from being published in the country, including “Popular Politics” and “Protesting non-violence.” Before her arrest, Ms. Trang and Mr. Will Nguyen, a Vietnamese-American citizen who had been detained in Vietnam, published the Dong Tam Report, which outlined the “human rights violations” of the Hanoi government in the past year; a deadly raid because of a land dispute between the authorities and the people of Dong Tam village.

    British Secretary of State Lord Ahmad called Ms. Trang a “brave human rights defender of Vietnam” while the Canadian Foreign Ministry called the jailed Vietnamese journalist “a supporter of human rights and the rule of law”, during the awarding of the imprisoned Vietnamese democracy activist.

    BNG Vietnam’s deputy spokesman on February 18 warned that the awarding by the British and Canadian Foreign Ministries to Ms. Trang would be “not conducive to the development of bilateral relations with Vietnam.”


    Download the article in Vietnamese:

    Download the article in English:

  • LIV’s Vi Tran in Asia Democracy Chronicles: Who’s afraid of NGOs?

    LIV’s Vi Tran in Asia Democracy Chronicles: Who’s afraid of NGOs?

    Quynh-Vi Tran, co-founder of Taiwan-based Legal Initiatives for Vietnam and editor-in-chief of The Vietnamese Magazine, wrote a commentary on how Vietnam has never been keen on having non-profits and how the country has made it even more difficult for such groups to continue operating in the country.


    Excerpt:

    When I was at the pre-session conference for Vietnam’s 3rd Universal Periodic Review in December 2018, the representative of the Canadian Mission in Geneva asked me — after I had delivered my statement on the death penalty in Vietnam — what the distinction was between registered and non-registered civil society organizations in Vietnam. Despite five consecutive years of working on human rights in Vietnam, I still could not give the representative a full definition of the distinction between the two groups. I just didn’t know how to explain it.

    I was only able to reply that Legal Initiatives for Vietnam (LIV), the organization that I had co-founded with journalists Pham Doan Trang and Trinh Huu Long, was not registered in Vietnam. We fell under the category of “non-registered” organizations.

    LIV is a 501(c)(3) organization registered in California. As of December 2021, we were also registered as a legal entity in Taiwan. Nevertheless, it does not matter how many countries recognize LIV as a legal entity. Vietnam will still consider it as “non-registered” as long as the Vietnamese Communist Party is still the only political party in the country. That is because it wants to de-legitimize LIV as an official non-profit organization so that it can create propaganda against us, our work, and our staff. It makes it easier for the Party to defame us by saying that we are not a legitimate media group since we are not registered in Vietnam.

    Why would the Party want to treat LIV like this? It is because LIV operates two online magazines and we refuse to comply with state censorship and also self-censorship. We are a truly independent media organization, and we also call for political pluralism in Vietnam.

    Ever-shrinking civic space

    When I started writing these lines during the first month of 2022, Vietnam had already sentenced two NGO directors to four and five years’ imprisonment for tax evasion. The two are Mai Phan Loi, a former journalist and the director of the Center for Media in Educating Community, and Dang Dinh Bach, the director of Law and Policy of Sustainable Development. Both men had worked on environmental rights. Both organizations are “registered” NGOs in Vietnam.

    In January 2022, Nguy Thi Khanh, the co-editor and founder of Green ID, was also arrested under another alleged tax evasion charge, the free-speech group The 88 Project reported. Nguy Thi Khanh had won an international award for her work in sustainable energy development. On Feb. 9, the Vietnamese media reported that she had been formally prosecuted by the Hanoi Police investigation department.

    After the convictions of Loi and Bach and the arrest of Khanh in January, I started to believe that Vietnam had never made a real distinction between registered and non-registered non-profit groups. Organizations were not black or white. Vietnamese authorities just never wanted the expansion of the civil society sector in the country. Therefore, the idea that people like Loi, Bach, and Khanh joining the DAG of the EVFTA to observe the government’s compliance in an international trade deal would be just as worrisome for Vietnam as how LIV and its independent magazines write facts and truths about them.

    The price of speaking out

    Did learning about how the government began its suppression of the registered organizations in Vietnam make me lose hope for a day when human rights will be respected in Vietnam? No, it did not.

    When Pham Doan Trang, Trinh Huu Long, and I began to develop LIV with our two online magazines, our common goal was to use journalism to promote human rights, democracy, and the rule of law in Vietnam. We wanted to write and to be a part of independent journalism. In an authoritarian regime like Vietnam, however, that meant that the three of us had to take on a role that few people would be willing to take: being classified as “enemies of the state.”

    Because we dared to take on this role, my close friend and colleague, Pham Doan Trang, was sentenced to nine years of imprisonment in December 2021, after more than one year of being detained incommunicado. Trinh Huu Long and I cannot go back to Vietnam; if we do, it’s certain that we will meet the same fate as Doan Trang.

    From the recent convictions of Loi and Bach — the directors of two registered NGOs in Vietnam — we can see that the fate of Doan Trang was being shared with many NGO workers inside the country. But that will not deter those of us from continuing our work. Because for us, the government has shown that it fears civil society.

    If any person or group demands that Vietnam respect human rights, be it the freedom of expression, workers’ rights, or environmental rights, the government only shows one reaction: to arrest and imprison those asking for such rights. This demonstrates that the Vietnamese government is the main culprit that is preventing Vietnam from being a country that respects human rights and follows international laws.

    The authoritarian nature of our government is the cause that prevents Vietnam from moving forward to be a democratic country. But the more suppression the government does — be it toward the registered or non-registered groups — the weaker it becomes.

    LIV and I will continue to write about the human rights situation in Vietnam because we need to continue to tell the truth and hold the authorities accountable. LIV exists so that the stories of Pham Doan Trang, Mai Phan Loi, and Dang Dinh Bach will be told to the public. These are the stories that we will carry with us on our way toward achieving democracy and human rights for our nation. And we will get there someday.


    Download:

  • Vietnam Briefing: Human Rights Watch Says Vietnam Systematically Restricts And Violates Freedom Of Movement

    Vietnam Briefing: Human Rights Watch Says Vietnam Systematically Restricts And Violates Freedom Of Movement

    The Vietnam Briefing, which is released every Monday morning Vietnam time, looks at Vietnam’s social and political developments of the past week.

    Source:  The Vietnamese Magazine


    Day to remember: On February 17, 1979, hundreds of thousands of Chinese troops crossed Vietnam’s northern border and launched a bloody invasion of its ideological bedfellow. While Chinese soldiers reportedly withdrew from Vietnam on March 18, sporadic clashes and provocations by Chinese forces were documented in several of Vietnam’s border provinces over the coming decades. It is estimated that tens of thousands of casualties were recorded on both sides.


    The Vietnamese government systematically restricts the freedom of movement of political dissidents, says Human Rights Watch

    • On February 17, rights advocate Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report documenting the Vietnamese government’s violation of the right to freedom of movement of local activists, dissidents, human rights defenders, and others.
    • The 65-page report, titled “Locked Inside Our Home: Movement Restrictions on Rights Activists in Vietnam,” reviews the government’s systematic obstruction of movement of more than 170 Vietnamese activists, bloggers, human rights defenders, as well as their family members. The Vietnamese authorities are reportedly “engaged in collective punishment” against dissidents, including the practice of imposing arbitrary house arrests, confiscating their passports, banning them from international travel, and other forms of control.
    • According to HRW, these methods are used to prevent local dissenting communities from “attending protests, criminal trials, meetings with foreign diplomats and a US president, and other events.”
    • “Vietnamese rights campaigners face severe government repression just because they dare to organize or attend events, or seek to travel for their work,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director of HRW. “Vietnam’s donors and trade partners should recognize this daily repression of free movement and press the government to end these paralyzing practices.”

    Vietnamese workers strike to demand better working benefits

    RFA reports:

    • More than 2,000 workers at a Korean electronics factory in Vietnam’s northern industrial province of Bac Ninh went on strike on Monday, following a successful worker action at another foreign-owned plant in the country, local media reported.
    • Employees at the Cresyn Hanoi Co factory demanded wage increases, meal allowances, and bonuses for working on Vietnam’s Reunification Day on April 30 and Labor Day on May 1, according to a Vietnamese daily newspaper, Tien Phong.
    • The strike comes after a successful strike by workers at the Taiwanese-owned footwear manufacturer Viet Glory Co., a factory located in central Vietnam’s Nghe An Province. The company ceded to demands by its 5,000-strong workforce to increase salaries and provide extra pay for long-term workers, along with other benefits, according to state media.

    Dissident blogger Huynh Thuc Vy relocated to a new detention center

    • On February 18, the family of activist and dissident blogger Huynh Thuc Vy told RFA Vietnamese that she had been transferred to a new detention center, which is located about 200 kilometers from her home.
    • Vy, 36, was sentenced to nearly three years in prison for “insulting Vietnam’s national flag” in 2018 after she was found spraying paint on the Communist country’s flag on its Independence Day. She was granted a stay of execution but was subsequently arrested on December 1 last year after the court reversed its previous decision.
    • Since then, Vy had been detained at the Dak Lak Police Detention Center. But according to Huynh Ngoc Tuan, her father, she was recently transferred to Gia Trung Detention Center on January 28, a facility located in Gia Lai Province. Tuan added that he only learned about the relocation of Vy on February 10, after he went to the Dak Lak Police to give basic necessities to his daughter.
    • According to the latest update on social media from Vy’s father, she called home on February 20. “[Vy’s] health and mentality are in good condition,” Tuan wrote.

    New U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam in a speech vows to promote bilateral relations

    • Ambassador to Vietnam Marc Knapper on February 17 emphasized the relationship between Vietnam and the United States where their cooperation needs to be in five main areas under its new Indo-Pacific Strategy, VnExpress reports.
    • The five points of the new strategy include the pursuit of a free and open Indo-Pacific, expanding cooperation, promoting prosperity, enhancing security, and strengthening the resilience of the region, Knapper said on the sidelines of a conference helping Vietnam resolve the postwar landmines legacy.
    • “The U.S. and Vietnam have a great relationship, developing in all aspects including security, trade, investment, climate change, health, people-to-people diplomacy, energy, science, and technology,” he added.
    • Previously, in a video released by the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi at the start of his new position, Knapper said he is “honored to return to Vietnam” and vowed to “continue the important work our two nations are doing together and to build upon it.”
    • Nonetheless, many human rights advocates expressed their disappointment that the new ambassador had made no mention concerning the human rights problem in Vietnam.
    • Meanwhile, in a co-written letter sent to Ambassador Knapper on January 28, Congresswomen Zoe Lofgren and Anna G. Eshoo, along with five House colleagues, congratulated him on his new position and urged him to prioritize the ongoing human rights issues in Vietnam. “We understand Vietnam and the United States are seeking to build a closer strategic relationship…. Such a relationship, however, cannot come at the expense of human rights and values that the international community upholds,” the letter said.

    The 88 Project highlights concerns over tightening freedom of expression

    “This periodic legal update is The 88 Project’s effort to monitor and document the legal developments related to freedom of expression in Vietnam. Bringing them to light and under the scrutiny of human rights observers will help hold the Vietnamese government accountable in the implementation of the human rights commitment that the authorities have made to their own citizens and to the international community:

    1. Directive 12/CT-TTg (May 2021): The Origin of the COVID national crackdown
    2. Circular 30/2021/TT-BGDĐT (November 2021): Prior Censorship Down to the Kindergarten Level
    3. Decree 86/2021/NĐ-CP (September 2021): A Reminder for Academics Abroad
    4. Decision 2576/QĐ-BVHTTDL (October 2021): “Combatting” Freedom of Religion”

    Vietnam to fully reopen borders in mid-March

    Reuters reports:

    “Vietnam on Wednesday finalized a plan to fully reopen its borders to foreign tourists from next month, as it looks to accelerate its economic recovery and revive a battered tourism sector.

    “The approval is in accordance with the government’s new responses to the pandemic, which are adapting safely and flexibly and controlling the virus effectively,” the government said in a statement.”


    Vietnam Insight: Learn more about Vietnam

    Rising Risks from Cross-ownership between Real Estate Developers and Banks in Vietnam

    ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute/ Tuan Ho, Tuan Huu Nguyen, Trang Thi Ngoc Nguyen, and Tho Ngoc Tran/ February 17

    “Some industry experts have warned about the risks associated with this new form of cross-holdings in the banking system, particularly amid disruptions to the real estate market caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. For example, Le Xuan Nghia, former vice-chairman of the National Financial Supervisory Committee, emphasized that real estate companies serving as “backyards” of commercial banks need special attention from regulators.[12] He pointed out that several real estate developers have weak balance sheets, high debt-to-total asset ratio, and low liquidity ratio, and that their financial position “may be even worse than Evergrande’s”.[13] He also argued that the true picture is blurred by a thick “financial fog”[14] and the common practice of developers using nominees, such as their drivers, housekeepers and security guards, to set up affiliates to get bank loans on their behalf. He warned that if regulators failed to supervise carefully, cases like Evergrande would soon emerge in Vietnam.”

    Girl’s fatal beating spotlights child abuse in Vietnam

    Southeast Asia Globe/ Govi Snell/ February 17

    “The girl’s death brought renewed attention to the prevalence of child abuse in the country. Although progress has been made in protecting Vietnamese children, maltreatment rates remain high. A UNICEF survey found 68.4% of Vietnamese children between 1 and 14-years-old have been victims of domestic violence by their parents or caretakers.”

    Southeast Asian Elite Survey Paints Complex Picture of China Ties

    The Diplomat/ Sebastian Strangio/ February 17

    “Ultimately, the 2022 State of Southeast Asia survey report articulates with a considerable degree of nuance the region’s fraught and ambivalent views of China, which can perhaps best be summed up as “can’t live with it, can’t live without it.” While Southeast Asians are overwhelmingly fearful of Beijing’s growing power and ambition, they are also aware that it is an important economic interlocutor and an unavoidable partner on many of the region’s most pressing issues. Similarly, while the U.S. and other major powers command higher levels of trust and support among the region’s elites, the latter do not share Washington’s often binary framing of U.S.-China competition, and are unlikely to join any coalition organized solely around the goal of containing Chinese power.”

    China and the Fall of South Vietnam: The Last Great Secret of the Vietnam War

    Wilson Center/ George J. Veith/ February 9

    “Why would China militarily intercede to thwart a North Vietnamese victory, especially after years of supporting Hanoi?

    China wanted a neutral South Vietnam to prevent being surrounded by a potential Moscow-Hanoi pact. Nayan Chanda, the highly respected correspondent for the Far Eastern Economic Review, extensively detailed the Chinese dread of a unified Vietnam. He wrote that Beijing has “consistently followed the policy of maintaining by all the means at its disposal a fragmented Indochina free of the major powers. These means included quiet diplomacy, economic persuasion, and, of course, use of its military might.”[ii]”

    💡
  • Pham Doan Trang in News Hub Global: FIFDH dedicates its 20th edition to Pham Doan Trang and Ida Leblanc

    The International Film Festival on Human Rights (FIFDH) dedicates its 20th edition to human rights defenders Pham Doan Trang and Ida Leblanc.


    Excerpt:

    Journalist and blogger Pham Doan Trang has been in detention since October 2020 and was recently sentenced to 9 years in prison for “propaganda against the state”. The 43-year-old was accused by the Hanoi regime of “defaming the Vietnamese government and inventing fake news“. In one of the world’s most repressive countries towards civil society, where freedom of the press is non-existent, Pham Doan Trang – RSF 2019 Prize – has founded numerous independent media and publishing houses – including Nha Xuat Ban Tu Do or Law Magazine – and the NGO Green Trees, making her the target of a government that does not tolerate dissent. Despite intimidation, torture and repeated arrests, Pham Doan Trang is fighting to end systematic abuse of both human rights and freedom of the press in Vietnam. She won several awards including recently the Martin Ennals Award 2022.


    Download: